Tee Yong issues fresh challenge

The People want to know what is the valuation policy for the RM676 million Talam’s bail out.  Khalid as the Menteri Besar and the mastermind of this bail out should be answerable to the questionable valuation of the lands which are submerged in water and on the hill slope..

Selangor Mentri BesarTan Sri Khalid Ibrahim has been challenged to another round of debate over the Talamgate controversy this time, on policy.

MCA Young Professionals Bureau chief Datuk Chua Tee Yong said the debate would be confined to just that as per Khalid’s request.

“I hereby challenge Khalid to debate on the policies of Pakatan Rakyat-led Selangor Government, including the state’s valuation policy and its policy decisions, particularly in the Talam transaction,” he said in a statement here yesterday.

Chua also questioned whether the Selangor Government would accept the valuation carried out by the Valuation and Property Services Department or private surveyors on the land assets involved.

Datuk Chua Tee Yong

Noting that even though the department had valued the Bukit Beruntung 2 land at RM113mil, he said the Selangor Government had accepted the property from Talam Corporation Bhd for RM345mil.

“This is the rakyat‘s money. As such, there must be accountability,” he said.

In July, Chua had questioned how an exercise to recover RM392mil debt owed by Talam to state-linked companies ended up in questionable deals worth over RM1bil.

The RM1bil deals include Talam assets acquired by the Selangor Government at RM676mil to offset the debt and a RM392mil grant obtained by the Mentri Besar Incorporated to facilitate the debt recovery exercise.

On Khalid’s demand for an apology, Chua said the Mentri Besar was not answerable to him but to the people of Selangor.

“Instead, Khalid should apologise to the rakyat of Selangor for failing to uphold the Pakatan Rakyat’s CAT (competency, accountability and transparency) policy,” he said.

Describing the KPMG Transaction and Restructuring Sdn Bhd report, commissioned by Selangor Government, as merely a “public relations tool”, Chua said until today, the state had yet to clarify if this was an audit, a limited review or an advisory.

The Selangor Government, he added, should take note that companies which had been cleared by auditors could still be hauled up for questioning.

He said KPMG Advisory Unit executive director Chan Siew Mei had also stated that the scope of work was strictly to check on transactions and supporting documents, and not to see if these allegations were true.

Chua pointed out that when Chan was asked if she had found instances in which the value of land assets were lower than the debt it was to offset, she had replied that the “short answer is yes”.

“For all this work, apparently KPMG is paid RM500,000?” he asked.

Selangor Anti-Corruption Movement (GAPS) chairman Hamidzun Khairuddin dared Khalid to pick the time, date and venue for a dialogue with Chua.

“The people want Khalid to answer the questions raised, especially as the answers could not be found in the KPMG report,” he said.

Selangor Barisan deputy chairman Datuk Seri Mohd Noh Omar said Khalid should be brave enough to face Chua and stop making flimsy excuses to evade the subject.

 

Advertisements

27 thoughts on “Tee Yong issues fresh challenge

  1. The state government should engage ANY TOM DICK AND HENRY ADVISORY FRIM and get a much LOWER FEES, just for echoing that the selangor government statement.

    THEY SHOULDN’T SPEND SATE FUNDS SO NEEDLESSLY.

  2. Ini satu kesilapan MB memakai Menteri Besar Inc (MBI) untuk memungut hutang Talam. MBI ni satu badan kerajaan dan bukan syarikat ditubuhkan di bawah Akta Syarikat 1965, sebab ini lah MBI adalah tertakluk kepada polisi kerajaan..jabatan kerajaan harus merujuk kepada jabatan penilaian kerajaan untuk tujuan menentukan nilai pasaran aset termasuk tanah, rumah dan bangunan komersial.
    Kesilapan ini cukup serius bagi tanah bukit beruntung kerana keputusan untuk mengabaikan laporan penilaian jabatan penilaian kerajaan mungkin melibatkan kecurangan.

  3. Alamak! SPR chairman says there is unsur penipuan in PKR audit of selangor electoral roll! Just cross my mind whether it happens to be the same auditors engaged to investigate debt collection deal!

  4. 卡立到底在逃避什么,白皮书又拿不出来, 一直讲没有问题, 当人民是白痴咩。 花了一大笔钱请KPMG, 又不敢公布报告书内容,到底有什么不见得光的丑闻。

  5. CTY cuma budak akauntan, ….mampu memahami transaksi yang sebegitu kompleks? MB Khalid adalah MB Selangor yang pertama saya hormati, ahli korporat yang tidak bercakap bukan-bukan, tidak berbuat yang bukan-bukan (spt memberi penyapu kepada kakitangan yang tidak mempunyai pencapaian yang memuaskan) dsb, bukan seperti MB-MB lama yang kaki rasuah atau gila perempuan sampai nak kahwin lari.

      • 你是選擇性失憶是嗎?
        當初喊告,你們又不爽,說什麼。。原來不能質疑雪州政府
        不告了,找你們辩论,TMD你們又不敢來。。。
        去了你們那裡又被黑社會趕出來。。。

        你MD! 誰的态度才有问题!回家問你媽啦!笨!

      • 又告又不告, 肯定身有屎, 要不然以反对党的性格, 一早就把对手告上法庭,现在肯定有问题, 白皮书也一直不敢拿出来, 诸多籍口。

    • Dia promise banyak-banyak tapi semua tak ditepati… mengambil alih syarikat air tak berjaya, suruh kita minum air mentah. Sekarang kes Talam pun tak berani menerima cabaran dari chua. Tak guna langsung lah.

  6. 达南事件越来越多人关注, 特别是卡立第一次要委任4个代言人为他辩护, 这当中肯定有不为人知的东西。

  7. Dzulkefly hereby reminded that independent auditor KPMG Transaction & Restructuring (KPMG) had cleared the Pakatan Rakyat-led state government.

      • Pas the new government, touch wood

        Dzulkefly is a joker like tony pua. where is the independence? the auditors is paid and made to report to Selangor MB when the deal they supposedly audit is done by Selangor MB also.
        Like wise, the professional valuer for Talam is paid by Talam and addressed report to Talam..YOu just dont know the meaning of independence!

    • Pls check 9 Nov 2009 http://dun.selangor.gov.my/v2/hansard for all the lies recorded!
      Sinnce MBI is responsible to Dewan, the KPMG auditor and the scope of work should be decided by the Dewan, further, Hannan Yeoh’ condition that the assets from Talam must be free from bank loan must be complied as a decision of the Dewan.

      YAB DATO’ MENTERI BESAR: Terima kasih, Tuan Speaker. Terima kasih kepada rakanrakan
      dari Kg. Tunku, Bukit Antarabangsa, Subang Jaya, Sekinchan dan Kajang, yang samasama
      menyertai perbincangan perbahasan tentang peruntukan yang kita cadangkan. Saya
      ingin mengambil masa sedikit untuk memberikan penerangan bagaimana penyusunan semula
      hutang-hutang ini dilakukan, dan apa sebabnya kita bawa ke Dewan….

      Sekarang MBI ini berada di tempat Menteri Besar Incorporated, iaitu satu pejabat ataupun satu
      organisasi yang sama, yang mempunyai tanggungjawab kepada Dewan Negeri ini.

  8. All you cacat BN supporters listen! Talam’s debt is a legacy from BN administration in Selangor, so why was there no effort (by BN) to recover the debt

    • Kalau orang hutang awek RM100, anak awek gila-gila beritahu awek bahawa dia telah kutip semua hutang dengan tanah lumpur bernilai RM200 (harga pasaran hanya RM30), dia juga ambil alih pinjaman bank sebanyak RM100.

      Lepas tu, dia kata ayahnya tak sepandainya mengutip hutang. U kata dia bodoh tak?

  9. what we are more interested is whether taxpayers money have been used to do multi-million bailout to Talam and whether there has been clear accountability, transparency and due diligence on the way the debt restructuring exercise was planned and executed. That is more important than harping on the value or the location of the land and that is is what we want to know from the Menteri Besar before the next general elections.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s